Ιδρυματικό Αποθετήριο Ακαδημαϊκής Έρευνας
Πανεπιστήμιο Μακεδονίας
Παρακαλώ χρησιμοποιήστε αυτό το αναγνωριστικό για να παραπέμψετε ή να δημιουργήσετε σύνδεσμο προς αυτό το τεκμήριο:
https://ruomo.lib.uom.gr/handle/7000/1106Πλήρης εγγραφή μεταδεδομένων
| Πεδίο DC | Τιμή | Γλώσσα |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Avgeriou, Paris | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Taibi, Davide | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Ampatzoglou, Apostolos | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Arcelli Fontana, Francesca | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Besker, Terese | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Chatzigeorgiou, Alexander | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Lenarduzzi, Valentina | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Martini, Antonio | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Moschou, Athanasia | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Pigazzini, Ilaria | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Saarimaki, Nyyti | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Sas, Darius Daniel | - |
| dc.contributor.author | de Toledo, Saulo Soares | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Tsintzira, Angeliki-Agathi | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-02-07T12:16:17Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2022-02-07T12:16:17Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2021 | - |
| dc.identifier | 10.1109/MS.2020.3024958 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0740-7459 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1937-4194 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1109/MS.2020.3024958 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://ruomo.lib.uom.gr/handle/7000/1106 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | There are numerous commercial tools and research prototypes that offer support for measuring technical debt. However, different tools adopt different terms, metrics, and ways to identify and measure technical debt. These tools offer diverse features, and their popularity / community support varies significantly. Therefore, (a) practitioners face difficulties when trying to select a tool matching their needs; and (b) the concept of technical debt and its role in software development is blurred. We attempt to clarify the situation by comparing the features and popularity of technical debt measurement tools, and analyzing the existing empirical evidence on their validity. Our findings can help practitioners to find the most suitable tool for their purposes, and researchers by highlighting the current tool shortcomings. | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.source | IEEE Software | en_US |
| dc.subject | FRASCATI::Natural sciences::Computer and information sciences | en_US |
| dc.subject.other | Technical Debt | en_US |
| dc.subject.other | Tools | en_US |
| dc.subject.other | Source Code Analysis | en_US |
| dc.subject.other | Software Quality | en_US |
| dc.title | An Overview and Comparison of Technical Debt Measurement Tools | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |
| dc.contributor.department | Τμήμα Εφαρμοσμένης Πληροφορικής | en_US |
| local.identifier.volume | 38 | en_US |
| local.identifier.issue | 3 | en_US |
| local.identifier.firstpage | 61 | en_US |
| local.identifier.lastpage | 71 | en_US |
| Εμφανίζεται στις Συλλογές: | Τμήμα Εφαρμοσμένης Πληροφορικής | |
Αρχεία σε αυτό το Τεκμήριο:
| Αρχείο | Περιγραφή | Μέγεθος | Μορφότυπος | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| overview.pdf | 982,29 kB | Adobe PDF |  Προβολή/Ανοιγμα |
Τα τεκμήρια στο Αποθετήριο προστατεύονται από πνευματικά δικαιώματα, εκτός αν αναφέρεται κάτι διαφορετικό.