Παρακαλώ χρησιμοποιήστε αυτό το αναγνωριστικό για να παραπέμψετε ή να δημιουργήσετε σύνδεσμο προς αυτό το τεκμήριο: https://ruomo.lib.uom.gr/handle/7000/1470
Πλήρης εγγραφή μεταδεδομένων
Πεδίο DCΤιμήΓλώσσα
dc.contributor.authorAlexiou, Constantinos-
dc.contributor.authorTrachanas, Emmanouil-
dc.contributor.authorVogiazas, Sofoklis-
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-05T11:19:53Z-
dc.date.available2022-10-05T11:19:53Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier10.1108/JES-05-2020-0202en_US
dc.identifier.issn0144-3585en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1108/JES-05-2020-0202en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://ruomo.lib.uom.gr/handle/7000/1470-
dc.description.abstractPurpose The authors explore the impact of financialization on income inequality for a panel of 19 OECD countries over the period 2000–2017. The authors control for the effect of banking crises, credit market regulation and globalization, among other factors. Design/methodology/approach The authors use three proxies for income inequality and four proxies for financialization. The authors employ a panel fixed effects approach using Driscoll and Kraay’s (1998) nonparametric covariance matrix estimator, which produces standard errors that are robust to general forms of cross-sectional dependence. Findings The authors provide evidence which to a great extent supports the view that the process of financialization has increased income inequality. In the disposable Gini specifications, two out of the four financialization measures are found to significantly contribute to rising inequality whilst in the specification with the market income Gini coefficient, three out of the four financialization proxies appear to adversely affect inequality. In the specification with the Gini coefficient based on manufacturing pay, the evidence is weak. Furthermore, trade unions appear to play a significant role in reducing inequality in two out of the three Gini specifications while the effect of credit market regulation is rather ambiguous. Originality/value The authors’ findings suggest a positive relationship between financialization and income inequality; however, the results depend on the proxies used to measure financialization and income inequality. The authors conclude that the process of financialization in triggering income inequality is complex and merits additional research.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.sourceJournal of Economic Studiesen_US
dc.subjectFRASCATI::Social sciences::Economics and Business::Economicsen_US
dc.subject.otherIncome inequalityen_US
dc.subject.otherFinancializationen_US
dc.subject.otherCredit regulationen_US
dc.subject.otherUnionizationen_US
dc.titleIncome inequality and financialization: a not so straightforward relationshipen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentΤμήμα Λογιστικής & Χρηματοοικονομικήςen_US
local.identifier.volume49en_US
local.identifier.issue1en_US
local.identifier.firstpage95en_US
local.identifier.lastpage111en_US
Εμφανίζεται στις Συλλογές: Τμήμα Λογιστικής & Χρηματοοικονομικής

Αρχεία σε αυτό το Τεκμήριο:
Αρχείο Περιγραφή ΜέγεθοςΜορφότυπος 
JES Alexiou, Trachanas, Vogiazas.pdf380,21 kBAdobe PDFΠροβολή/Ανοιγμα


Τα τεκμήρια στο Αποθετήριο προστατεύονται από πνευματικά δικαιώματα, εκτός αν αναφέρεται κάτι διαφορετικό.