Παρακαλώ χρησιμοποιήστε αυτό το αναγνωριστικό για να παραπέμψετε ή να δημιουργήσετε σύνδεσμο προς αυτό το τεκμήριο: https://ruomo.lib.uom.gr/handle/7000/658
Πλήρης εγγραφή μεταδεδομένων
Πεδίο DCΤιμήΓλώσσα
dc.contributor.authorPapadopoulou, Iris-
dc.contributor.authorKantaridou, Zoe-
dc.contributor.authorPlatsidou, Maria-
dc.contributor.authorGavriilidou, Zoe-
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-01T10:37:10Z-
dc.date.available2020-04-01T10:37:10Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier10.1080/09571736.2018.1502739-
dc.identifier.issn0957-1736en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://ruomo.lib.uom.gr/handle/7000/658-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2018.1502739-
dc.description.abstractThe Strategy Inventory for Language Learning (SILL) [Oxford, R.L. 1990. Language Learning Strategies: What Every Teacher Should Know. Boston: Heinle and Heinle] has been a widely used instrument for self-assessing the frequency of language learning strategy use across cultures and levels of education for some 30 years. Despite the fact that its six-factor solution has not been confirmed, it has displayed acceptable reliability across cultures and translations. In the present study, we attempt to demonstrate a new factor solution for the Greek version of the SILL which is in line with the S2R model of language learning. Our sample consisted of 1308 primary and secondary school students from public schools in the regions of Northern Greece. The SILL v7.0 was used with four additional items selected and adapted from SILL v5.0. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses revealed six factors which explained 42.48% of the total variance and demonstrated good or adequate reliability. The first two factors indicate the metastrategies of ‘monitoring cognition for progress’ and ‘obtaining resources’. The other four factors indicated strategies of ‘deep cognitive processing’, ‘using resources’, ‘surface cognitive processing’ and ‘overcoming gaps of knowledge’. We compare our results with factor solutions of the SILL obtained in earlier studies and we discuss implications for the development of new instruments to better accommodate the S2R model of language learning.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.sourceThe Language Learning Journalen_US
dc.subjectFRASCATI::Humanities::Languages and Literatureen_US
dc.subjectFRASCATI::Social sciences::Educational sciencesen_US
dc.subject.otherSILLen_US
dc.subject.otherlanguage learning strategiesen_US
dc.subject.otherself-regulationen_US
dc.subject.othermetastrategiesen_US
dc.subject.othermotivationen_US
dc.titleThe SILL revisited in light of the S2R model of language learningen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentΤμήμα Εκπαιδευτικής & Κοινωνικής Πολιτικήςen_US
local.identifier.volume46en_US
local.identifier.issue5en_US
local.identifier.firstpage544en_US
local.identifier.lastpage556en_US
local.identifier.eissn1753-2167en_US
Εμφανίζεται στις Συλλογές: Τμήμα Εκπαιδευτικής & Κοινωνικής Πολιτικής

Αρχεία σε αυτό το Τεκμήριο:
Αρχείο Περιγραφή ΜέγεθοςΜορφότυπος 
SILL revisited-corrected07062018.pdf687,23 kBAdobe PDFΠροβολή/Ανοιγμα


Τα τεκμήρια στο Αποθετήριο προστατεύονται από πνευματικά δικαιώματα, εκτός αν αναφέρεται κάτι διαφορετικό.