Παρακαλώ χρησιμοποιήστε αυτό το αναγνωριστικό για να παραπέμψετε ή να δημιουργήσετε σύνδεσμο προς αυτό το τεκμήριο: https://ruomo.lib.uom.gr/handle/7000/1306
Πλήρης εγγραφή μεταδεδομένων
Πεδίο DCΤιμήΓλώσσα
dc.contributor.authorPerifanou, Maria-
dc.contributor.authorHäfner, Polina-
dc.contributor.authorEconomides, Anastasios A.-
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-22T12:09:55Z-
dc.date.available2022-09-22T12:09:55Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier10.21125/edulearn.2022.2379en_US
dc.identifier.isbn978-84-09-42484-9en_US
dc.identifier.issn2340-1117en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2022.2379en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://ruomo.lib.uom.gr/handle/7000/1306-
dc.description.abstractTelepresence robots (TR) enable people to be represented by a mobile robot at a distant location and audio-visually interact with people and the environment around the robot. The user of the TR remotely controls and drives the TR in its environment as well as interacts with people using microphones, speakers, cameras, screens, and other facilities of the TR. TR have been exploited in various areas including education. However, most previous studies examined specific cases of introducing TR in education. The current study aims at synthesizing the experiences and perceptions of various TR users at different countries and various institutes. A qualitative research study was implemented with regard to the Erasmus+ project TRinE: Telepresence Robots in education. The team conducted 20 interviewees with experienced users (students, educators, technicians, etc.) in the integration of TR in education across Austria, France, Iceland, and U.S.A. The interviewer interrogated the interviewee employing 28 questions about the interviewee’s views, practices and experiences with TR in education. The results shown that the most common use of TR was that of a remote teacher or student participating in a class via a TR. The most frequently mentioned TR strength include the ability of the remote students to feel present, participate, communicate, and socialize with their classmates; TR weaknesses include their weak wireless connectivity, low sound and camera quality, lack of hands and gestures; TR challenges include obstacles in its movement (e.g., elevators, doors, stairs), privacy concerns, lack of WiFi everywhere, risks of misusing TR. The interviewees were not aware of any national or international policies about TR in education. Finally, they made recommendations in a number of issues.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherIATEDen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEDULEARN22 Proceedingsen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/*
dc.subjectFRASCATI::Social sciences::Educational sciences::Education, general (including: training, pedagogy,didactics)en_US
dc.subjectFRASCATI::Natural sciences::Computer and information sciencesen_US
dc.subject.othertelepresence robotsen_US
dc.subject.otherremote educationen_US
dc.subject.otherremote learningen_US
dc.subject.otherremote teachingen_US
dc.subject.otherdistance educationen_US
dc.subject.otherdistance teachingen_US
dc.subject.otherdistance learningen_US
dc.subject.otherinterviewsen_US
dc.titleUSERS’ EXPERIENCES AND PERCEPTIONS ABOUT TELEPRESENCE ROBOTS IN EDUCATIONen_US
dc.typeConference Paperen_US
dc.contributor.departmentΤμήμα Οικονομικών Επιστημώνel
local.identifier.volume1en_US
local.identifier.firstpage9870en_US
local.identifier.lastpage9879en_US
local.identifier.volumetitleEDULEARN22 Proceedingsen_US
Εμφανίζεται στις Συλλογές: Τμήμα Οικονομικών Επιστημών

Αρχεία σε αυτό το Τεκμήριο:
Αρχείο Περιγραφή ΜέγεθοςΜορφότυπος 
RUOMO_EDULEARN_2022_final_USERS’ EXPERIENCES AND PERCEPTIONS ABOUT TELEPRESENCE ROBOTS IN EDUCATION.pdf208,36 kBAdobe PDFΠροβολή/Ανοιγμα


Αυτό το τεκμήριο προστατεύεται από Αδεια Creative Commons Creative Commons